Is fat making you weak?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is fat making you weak?

    Recent research is beginning to show a negative relationship between the amount of subcutaneous fat you have covering your muscle and the amount of force that muscle can produce per unit of area. That just means that as subcutaneous fat builds up on top of the muscle, its ability to generate force begins to decline.
    In light of this recent and growing body of research, a group from the University of Michigan wanted to see if this same effect was evident in nonobese and otherwise healthy young people. In addition, they wanted to see if 12 weeks of training would influence the effects of fat on the muscle. The study included 634 nonobese subjects (253 males and 381 females, with an average age of 23). Subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), muscle mass (magnetic resonance imaging derived SAT and biceps muscle volume), isometric and dynamic biceps strength, and muscle quality (strength/muscle volume) were measured at the beginning and after 12 weeks of resistance exercise of the nondominant biceps muscle. (1)
    As expected, muscle quality, or the strength per unit of muscle volume, was negatively associated with the amount of SAT covering the muscle at baseline. Interestingly, though somewhat disheartening, was the finding that not only did the fat covering the muscle hurt strength at the beginning of the trial, but it also negatively affected adaptation to the training regimen! Ouch! Keep in mind both the relationship between adipose tissue and muscle strength, as well as the relationship between the adipose tissue and the muscles' adaptability to training, were both statistically significant. In females, however, there was no negative effect on strength gains after training; the effect was observed only in males.
    EASY DOES IT
    So what's behind all this? Recent research has shown that "crosstalk" is going on between muscle stem cells and fat stem cells. The stem cells from fat are sending signals that trigger simultaneous muscle degeneration and formation of new fat cells, scar tissue, and/or collagen deposition within the muscle.' This ultimately leads to a decrease in strength and hampers your muscles' ability to recover properly from training. in practical terms, this new knowledge tens us that Keep in mind that the subjects involved in this study were not obese by any stretch. Your best bet is to try to stay under 12%-13% body fat in the off-season or when you're just trying to put on some significant scale weight. Once you're done putting on size, take some time and lean out before you hit it again. Your muscles will thank you for it!
    REFERENCES: 1) M.D. Peterson et al., Int. J. Obes. (Lond.)., 35(8): 1095-2103, 2011.2) M.S. Rodeheffer, Nat. Cell Biol., 12:102-04, 2010.
    1e Masters Superbody YBF 2011!
    Go M.U.D. Mart's Ultimate Diet ©

  • #2
    Tsjonge ben ik bijna bij het einde van de tekst, kom ik erachter dat het niet voor dames geldt.

    Comment


    • #3
      Nou klinkt het mij helemaal niet verkeerd om te gaan proberen het gehele jaar droog te blijven en massa te gainen, haha.
      "Straight outta gym"

      Comment


      • #4
        Blurgh, mag ik niet meer veel in bf% stijgen Toch apart dan dat mensen met wat meer vet vaak vrij sterk zijn. Alleen hun kracht/spiervolume ratio zou lager liggen begrijp ik dus?
        "People laugh and call me lazy, while they twit around in their three-hour workout making zero progress. Sometimes, instead of what you do in the weight room, it's what you don't do that will lead to success."

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by FitnessBoer View Post
          Blurgh, mag ik niet meer veel in bf% stijgen Toch apart dan dat mensen met wat meer vet vaak vrij sterk zijn. Alleen hun kracht/spiervolume ratio zou lager liggen begrijp ik dus?
          de spierkwaliteit, spierkracht en de kracht per volume eenheid is veel lager.
          1e Masters Superbody YBF 2011!
          Go M.U.D. Mart's Ultimate Diet ©

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by FitnessBoer View Post
            Blurgh, mag ik niet meer veel in bf% stijgen Toch apart dan dat mensen met wat meer vet vaak vrij sterk zijn. Alleen hun kracht/spiervolume ratio zou lager liggen begrijp ik dus?
            Artikel gaat over onderhuids vet tussen de organen. Niet over het oppervlakkige vet. Als je niet te hoog gaat in vet% dan zal het ook niet opgeslagen worden tussen je organen en andere shit en dan kun je gewoon het beste hebben als het op kracht aan komt.

            Comment


            • #7
              ik wist dat ie zou komen om zichzelf te verdedigen.

              Gast, het onderzoek is duidelijk.
              1e Masters Superbody YBF 2011!
              Go M.U.D. Mart's Ultimate Diet ©

              Comment


              • #8
                Copy-paste stuk #40.548.220.498.402

                Begrijpend lezen, je eigen mening erop vormen (die je dan ondersteund met een copy paste stuk) en een stelling eraan verbinden is blijkbaar zo moeilijk

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Waterpoloboy View Post
                  Nou klinkt het mij helemaal niet verkeerd om te gaan proberen het gehele jaar droog te blijven en massa te gainen, haha.
                  12-13 % is nu niet meteen droog hé
                  Stop sitting back thinking, saying yeah man that 'd be cool, that 'd be cool, I want to be this I want to be that, grab your fucking nuts and be it!!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Ik kon zo gauw even geen andere bronnen vinden over verschillende types bodyfat, maar voor de liefhebbers van leesvoer hier dan:



                    In humans
                    In humans, adipose tissue is located beneath the skin (subcutaneous fat), around internal organs (visceral fat), in bone marrow (yellow bone marrow) and in breast tissue. Adipose tissue is found in specific locations, which are referred to as adipose depots. Adipose tissue contains several cell types, with the highest percentage of cells being adipocytes, which contain fat droplets. Other cell types include fibroblasts, macrophages, and endothelial cells. Adipose tissue contains many small blood vessels. In the integumentary system, which includes the skin, it accumulates in the deepest level, the subcutaneous layer, providing insulation from heat and cold. Around organs, it provides protective padding. However, its main function is to be a reserve of lipids, which can be burned to meet the energy needs of the body. Adipose depots in different parts of the body have different biochemical profiles. Under normal conditions, it provides feedback for hunger and diet to the brain.


                    Obesity
                    In a severely obese person, excess adipose tissue hanging downward from the abdomen is referred to as a panniculus (or pannus). A panniculus complicates surgery of the morbidly obese. It may remain as a literal "apron of skin" if a severely obese person quickly loses large amounts of fat (a common result of gastric bypass surgery). This condition cannot be effectively corrected through diet and exercise alone, as the panniculus consists of adipocytes and other supporting cell types shrunken to their minimum volume and diameter.[citation needed] Reconstructive surgery is one method of treatment.


                    Abdominal fat
                    See also: Abdominal obesity
                    Visceral fat or abdominal fat[6] also known as organ fat or intra-abdominal fat, is located inside the abdominal cavity, packed between the organs (stomach, liver, intestines, kidneys, etc.). Visceral fat is different from subcutaneous fat underneath the skin, and intramuscular fat interspersed in skeletal muscles. Fat in the lower body, as in thighs and buttocks, is subcutaneous, whereas fat in the abdomen is mostly visceral.[7] Visceral fat is composed of several adipose depots, including mesenteric, epididymal white adipose tissue (EWAT), and perirenal depots.
                    An excess of visceral fat is known as central obesity, or "belly fat", in which the abdomen protrudes excessively. The correlation between central obesity and cardiovascular disease is strong.[8] Excess visceral fat is also linked to type 2 diabetes,[9] insulin resistance,[10] inflammatory diseases,[11] and other obesity-related diseases.[12]
                    Female sex hormone causes fat to be stored in the buttocks, thighs, and hips in women.[13][14] Men are more likely to have fat stored in the belly due to sex hormone differences. When women reach menopause and the estrogen produced by ovaries declines, fat migrates from their buttocks, hips and thighs to their waists;[15] later fat is stored in the belly.[16]
                    High-intensity exercise is one way to effectively reduce total abdominal fat.[17][18] One study suggests at least 10 MET-hours per week of aerobic exercise is required for visceral fat reduction.[19]



                    Epicardial fat
                    Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is a particular form of visceral fat deposited around the heart and found to be a metabolically active organ that generates various bioactive molecules, which might significantly affect cardiac function.[20] Marked component differences have been observed in comparing EAT with subcutaneous fat, suggesting a depot specific impact of stored fatty acids on adipocyte function and metabolism.[21]



                    Subcutaneous fat
                    Most of the remaining nonvisceral fat is found just below the skin in a region called the hypodermis.[22] This subcutaneous fat is not related to many of the classic obesity-related pathologies, such as heart disease, cancer, and stroke, and some evidence even suggests it might be protective.[23] The typically female (or gynecoid) pattern of body fat distribution around the hips, thighs, and buttocks, is subcutaneous fat, and therefore poses less of a health risk compared to visceral fat.[24]
                    Like all other fat organs, subcutaneous fat is an active part of the endocrine system, secreting the hormones leptin and resistin.[22]
                    The relationship between the subcutaneous adipose layer and total body fat in a person is often modelled by using regression equations. The most popular of these equations was formed by Durnin and Wormersley, who rigorously tested many types of skinfold, and, as a result, created two formulae to calculate the body density of both men and women. These equations present an inverse correlation between skinfolds and body density – as the sum of skinfolds increases, the body density decreases.[25]
                    Factors such as sex, age, population size or other variables may make the equations invalid and unusable, and, as of 2012[update], Durnin and Wormersley's equations remain only estimates of a person's true level of fatness. New formulae are still being created to this day.[25]
                    1e Masters Superbody YBF 2011!
                    Go M.U.D. Mart's Ultimate Diet ©

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by blue_eye View Post
                      12-13 % is nu niet meteen droog hé
                      Zeker waar, maar maar 12% zou wel een van de betere bf% zijn om massa te gainen, dus als je daar rondom zou kunnen blijven zitten. Zou ik dat persoonlijk al wel goed vinden.
                      "Straight outta gym"

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        10-12% schijnt het beste VP te zijn om massa te gainen. Zelf schommel ik altijd rond dit VP en massa komt wel aardig.
                        Lid van de 200 club

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Om het maar even om te draaien... zit er überhaupt (behalve een excuus om meer/lekkerder te eten) een voordeel aan?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by marnop View Post
                            ik wist dat ie zou komen om zichzelf te verdedigen.

                            Gast, het onderzoek is duidelijk.
                            Ik hoef me niet te verdedigen. Onderzoek is inderdaad duidelijk. Een hoog vet% heeft niet per definitie negatieve impact op kracht prestaties. Een te hoog vetopslag onderhuids/orgaan daar en tegen wel. En bij welk vet% dat gebeurd ikke niet weet. Heb er zelf geen last van met mijn 22-23% vet. Dus je kan gewoon je vet% laten oplopen tot een bepaald punt. Dat jij het niet snapt en verkeerde conclusies trekt kan ik natuurlijk niks aan doen

                            Originally posted by Patricia86 View Post
                            Om het maar even om te draaien... zit er überhaupt (behalve een excuus om meer/lekkerder te eten) een voordeel aan?
                            Voor de gemiddelde sporter...nee. Als je kracht nodig hebt om zware objecten te verplaatsen is een hoger lichaamsgewicht/vet% makkelijker om het object uberhaupt in beweging te krijgen.
                            Last edited by Falstyr; 08-07-2012, 13:22.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Falstyr View Post
                              Voor de gemiddelde sporter...nee. Als je kracht nodig hebt om zware objecten te verplaatsen is een hoger lichaamsgewicht/vet% makkelijker om het object uberhaupt in beweging te krijgen.
                              Jij bedoelt als in truck-pull enzo?

                              Comment

                              Sidebar top desktop

                              Collapse

                              Actieve discussies

                              Collapse

                              Working...
                              X